z-logo
Premium
A Bayesian longitudinal trend analysis of count data with Gaussian processes
Author(s) -
VanSchalkwyk Samantha,
Jeske Daniel R.,
Kim Jane H.,
MartinsGreen Manuela
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
biometrical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.108
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1521-4036
pISSN - 0323-3847
DOI - 10.1002/bimj.202000298
Subject(s) - bayesian probability , count data , context (archaeology) , null hypothesis , inference , statistical hypothesis testing , statistics , computer science , bayesian inference , data mining , focus (optics) , feature (linguistics) , gaussian process , gaussian , mathematics , artificial intelligence , biology , poisson distribution , paleontology , linguistics , physics , philosophy , optics , quantum mechanics
The context of comparing two different groups of subjects that are measured repeatedly over time is considered. Our specific focus is on highly variable count data which have a nonnegligible frequency of zeros and have time trends that are difficult to characterize. These challenges are often present when analyzing bacteria or gene expression data sets. Traditional longitudinal data analysis methods, including generalized estimating equations, can be challenged by the features present in these types of data sets. We propose a Bayesian methodology that effectively confronts these challenges. A key feature of the methodology is the use of Gaussian processes to flexibly model the time trends. Inference procedures based on both sharp and interval null hypotheses are discussed, including for the important hypotheses that test for group differences at individual time points. The proposed methodology is illustrated with next‐generation sequencing (NGS) data sets corresponding to two different experimental conditions. In particular, the method is applied to a case study containing bacteria counts of mice with chronic and nonchronic wounds to identify potential wound‐healing probiotics. The methodology can be applied to similar NGS data sets comparing two groups of subjects.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here