Some philosophical considerations in using mixed methods in library and information science research
Author(s) -
Ma Lai
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of the american society for information science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1532-2890
pISSN - 1532-2882
DOI - 10.1002/asi.22711
Subject(s) - objectivity (philosophy) , objectivism , normative , relativism , epistemology , information science , sociology , computer science , data science , management science , psychology , philosophy , library science , economics
Mixed methods research ( MMR ) has been described as the third research paradigm that combines qualitative and quantitative research methods. The mixing of research methods requires an epistemological framework that embraces the “reality” uncovered by different research methods. Three formal ontological categories are introduced for deconstructing the polarized view of reality in objectivism and relativism and for differentiating the nature and characteristics of objective, subjective, and normative validity claims as well as the conditions for justifying “objectivity” in social research. The characterization of “information” as objective, subjective, and normative‐evaluative simultaneously demands the study of conditions of information‐related phenomena that may call for mixed methods research in library and information science.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom