z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Study of different h‐indices for groups of authors
Author(s) -
Egghe L.,
Rao I.K. Ravichandra
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of the american society for information science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1532-2890
pISSN - 1532-2882
DOI - 10.1002/asi.20809
Subject(s) - informetrics , statistics , rank correlation , rank (graph theory) , mathematics , index (typography) , spearman's rank correlation coefficient , group (periodic table) , combinatorics , library science , computer science , bibliometrics , physics , world wide web , quantum mechanics
In this article, for any group of authors, we define three different h‐indices. First, there is the successive h‐index h 2 based on the ranked list of authors and their h‐indices h 1 as defined by Schubert (2007). Next, there is the h‐index h P based on the ranked list of authors and their number of publications. Finally, there is the h‐index h C based on the ranked list of authors and their number of citations. We present formulae for these three indices in Lotkaian informetrics from which it also follows that h 2 < h p < h c . We give a concrete example of a group of 167 authors on the topic “optical flow estimation.” Besides these three h‐indices, we also calculate the two‐by‐two Spearman rank correlation coefficient and prove that these rankings are significantly related.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom