A formal knowledge management ontology: Conduct, activities, resources, and influences
Author(s) -
Holsapple C.W.,
Joshi K.D.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of the american society for information science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1532-2890
pISSN - 1532-2882
DOI - 10.1002/asi.20007
Subject(s) - ontology , knowledge management , computer science , process ontology , axiom , upper ontology , delphi method , taxonomy (biology) , formal ontology , field (mathematics) , data science , delphi , domain knowledge , epistemology , artificial intelligence , mathematics , philosophy , botany , geometry , pure mathematics , biology , operating system
This article describes a collaboratively engineered general‐purpose knowledge management (KM) ontology that can be used by practitioners, researchers, and educators. The ontology is formally characterized in terms of nearly one hundred definitions and axioms that evolved from a Delphi‐like process involving a diverse panel of over 30 KM practitioners and researchers. The ontology identifies and relates knowledge manipulation activities that an entity (e.g., an organization) can perform to operate on knowledge resources. It introduces a taxonomy for these resources, which indicates classes of knowledge that may be stored, embedded, and/or represented in an entity. It recognizes factors that influence the conduct of KM both within and across KM episodes. The Delphi panelists judge the ontology favorably overall: its ability to unify KM concepts, its comprehensiveness, and utility. Moreover, various implications of the ontology for the KM field are examined as indicators of its utility for practitioners, educators, and researchers.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom