z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Measurement of cell‐bound complement activation products enhances diagnostic performance in systemic lupus erythematosus
Author(s) -
Kalunian Kenneth C.,
Chatham W. Winn,
Massarotti Elena M.,
ReyesThomas Joyce,
Harris Cole,
Furie Richard A.,
Chitkara Puja,
Putterman Chaim,
Gross Rachel L.,
Somers Emily C.,
Kirou Kyriakos A.,
RamseyGoldman Rosalind,
Hsieh Christine,
Buyon Jill P.,
Dervieux Thierry,
Weinstein Arthur
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
arthritis & rheumatism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1529-0131
pISSN - 0004-3591
DOI - 10.1002/art.34669
Subject(s) - medicine , autoantibody , immunology , rheumatoid arthritis , anti nuclear antibody , antibody , lupus erythematosus , serology , logistic regression , gastroenterology
Objective To determine the value of cell‐bound complement activation products in combination with antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti–double‐stranded DNA antibody (anti‐dsDNA), and anti–mutated citrullinated vimentin antibody (anti‐MCV) for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods This was a multicenter cross‐sectional study in which 593 subjects were enrolled (210 SLE patients, 178 patients with other rheumatic diseases, and 205 healthy subjects). Complement receptor 1 levels on erythrocytes (ECR1) together with complement C4d levels on erythrocytes (EC4d), platelets (PC4d), and B cells (BC4d) were determined using fluorescence‐activated cell sorting. Serologic markers were measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Statistical analyses were performed using area under the curve (AUC), logistic regression, and calculations of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Results Anti‐dsDNA was an insensitive (30%) but specific (>95%) marker for SLE. Levels of EC4d, BC4d, and PC4d were several times higher, and levels of ECR1 lower, in SLE patients compared to patients with other rheumatic diseases and healthy subjects. Among 523 anti‐dsDNA–negative subjects, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that SLE was associated with ANA positivity (≥20 units), anti‐MCV negativity (≤70 units), and elevated levels of both EC4d and BC4d (AUC 0.918, P < 0.001). A positive index score corresponding to the weighted sum of these 4 markers correctly categorized 72% of SLE patients. Specificity in relation to patients with other rheumatic diseases and healthy controls was >90%. The combination of anti‐dsDNA and index score positivity yielded 80% sensitivity for SLE and 87% specificity against other rheumatic diseases. Conclusion An assay panel combining anti‐dsDNA, ANA, anti‐MCV, EC4d, and BC4d is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of SLE.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom