
Differences in multijoint radiographic osteoarthritis phenotypes among African Americans and Caucasians: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project
Author(s) -
Nelson Amanda E.,
Renner Jordan B.,
Schwartz Todd A.,
Kraus Virginia B.,
Helmick Charles G.,
Jordan Joanne M.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
arthritis & rheumatism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1529-0131
pISSN - 0004-3591
DOI - 10.1002/art.30610
Subject(s) - medicine , osteoarthritis , radiography , odds ratio , body mass index , odds , arthropathy , logistic regression , cross sectional study , surgery , pathology , alternative medicine
Objective To define and contrast multiple joint radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) phenotypes describing hand and whole‐body radiographic OA among African Americans and Caucasians. Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional analysis in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project, using radiographic data for the hands, tibiofemoral (TF) joints, patellofemoral joints, hips, and lumbosacral (LS) spine. Radiographs were read for OA by a single radiologist using standard atlases. Fisher's exact test, with correction for multiple comparisons, was used to compare phenotype frequencies by race and sex. Logistic regression was used to provide odds ratios, which were adjusted for sex, age, and body mass index (BMI). Results Sixteen mutually exclusive hand (n = 2,083) and 32 whole‐body (n = 1,419) radiographic OA phenotypes were identified. We found that in comparison to Caucasians, African Americans had significantly less frequent radiographic OA of the distal interphalangeal joints, both in isolation and in combination with other hand joint sites, but had comparable frequencies of radiographic OA for other hand joint sites. Moreover, African Americans had less frequent radiographic OA of the hand, both in isolation and in combination with other joint sites, as compared to Caucasians. In contrast, African Americans had more than twice the odds of isolated OA of the TF joint and 77% higher odds of radiographic OA of the TF joint and LS spine together as compared to Caucasians. Conclusion Even after adjustment for sex, age, and BMI, African Americans were less likely than Caucasians to have hand radiographic OA phenotypes, but more likely to have knee radiographic OA phenotypes involving the TF joint. African Americans may have a higher burden of multiple large‐joint OA involvement not captured by most definitions of “generalized OA.”