Temporal Changes in Effect Sizes of Studies Comparing Individuals With and Without Autism
Author(s) -
EyaMist Rødgaard,
Kristian Jensen,
Jean-Noël Vergnes,
Isabelle Soulières,
Laurent Mottron
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jama psychiatry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.531
H-Index - 365
eISSN - 2168-6238
pISSN - 2168-622X
DOI - 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1956
Subject(s) - autism , meta analysis , psychology , sample size determination , clinical psychology , population , neurocognitive , publication bias , systematic review , developmental psychology , medline , cognition , medicine , psychiatry , statistics , environmental health , mathematics , political science , law
The definition and nature of autism have been highly debated, as exemplified by several revisions of the DSM (DSM-III, DSM-IIIR, DSM-IV, and DSM-5) criteria. There has recently been a move from a categorical view toward a spectrum-based view. These changes have been accompanied by a steady increase in the prevalence of the condition. Changes in the definition of autism that may increase heterogeneity could affect the results of autism research; specifically, a broadening of the population with autism could result in decreasing effect sizes of group comparison studies.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom