z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of Early Intervention Services vs Treatment as Usual for Early-Phase Psychosis
Author(s) -
Christoph U. Correll,
Britta Galling,
Aditya Pawar,
Anastasia Krivko,
Chiara Bonetto,
Mirella Ruggeri,
Tom Craig,
Merete Nordentoft,
Vinod H. Srihari,
Sinan Gülöksüz,
Christy Lai Ming Hui,
Eric Chen,
Marcelo Valencia,
Francisco Juárez,
Delbert G. Robinson,
Nina R. Schooler,
Mary F. Brunette,
Kim T. Mueser,
Robert A. Rosenheck,
Patricia Marcy,
Jean Addington,
Sue E. Estroff,
James Robinson,
David L. Penn,
Joanne B. Severe,
John M. Kane
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
jama psychiatry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.531
H-Index - 365
eISSN - 2168-6238
pISSN - 2168-622X
DOI - 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0623
Subject(s) - psychosis , early psychosis , psychiatry , intervention (counseling) , psychology , medicine
The value of early intervention in psychosis and allocation of public resources has long been debated because outcomes in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders have remained suboptimal.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom