z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Condom Use With Long-Acting Reversible Contraception vs Non–Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Hormonal Methods Among Postpartum Adolescents
Author(s) -
Katherine Kortsmit,
Letitia Williams,
Karen Pazol,
Ruben Smith,
Maura K. Whiteman,
Wanda D. Barfield,
Emilia H. Koumans,
Athena P. Kourtis,
Leslie Harrison,
Brenda L. Bauman,
Lee Warner
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jama pediatrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.004
H-Index - 183
eISSN - 2168-6211
pISSN - 2168-6203
DOI - 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1136
Subject(s) - medicine , condom , long acting reversible contraception , birth control , hormonal contraception , pregnancy , obstetrics , population , family planning , pill , gynecology , family medicine , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , environmental health , nursing , syphilis , research methodology , biology , genetics
Increased use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC; intrauterine devices [IUDs] and implants) has likely contributed to declining US teenage pregnancy and birth rates, yet sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates among teenagers remain high. While LARC methods are highly effective for pregnancy prevention, they, as with all nonbarrier methods, do not protect against STIs, including HIV. Studies of the general adolescent population suggest condom use is lower among LARC vs non-LARC hormonal methods users (birth control pill, contraceptive patch, vaginal ring, or injection). Despite the high use of LARC among postpartum teenagers, no studies have examined whether condom use differs by contraceptive method in this population.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom