Heated, Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Respiratory Distress Syndrome of Prematurity | Zendy

Anna Lavizzari | Zendy; Mariarosa Colnaghi | Zendy; F Ciuffini | Zendy; Chiara Veneroni | Zendy; S Musumeci | Zendy; Ivan Cortinovis | Zendy; Fabio Mosca | Zendy

Open Access

Heated, Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Respiratory Distress Syndrome of Prematurity

Author(s) -

Anna Lavizzari,

Mariarosa Colnaghi,

F Ciuffini,

Chiara Veneroni,

S Musumeci,

Ivan Cortinovis,

Fabio Mosca

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

jama pediatrics

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 4.004

H-Index - 183

eISSN - 2168-6211

pISSN - 2168-6203

DOI - 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1243

Subject(s) - medicine , nasal cannula , continuous positive airway pressure , respiratory distress , fraction of inspired oxygen , gestational age , anesthesia , neonatal intensive care unit , positive airway pressure , retinopathy of prematurity , bronchopulmonary dysplasia , randomized controlled trial , intubation , mechanical ventilation , pediatrics , cannula , surgery , obstructive sleep apnea , pregnancy , biology , genetics

Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) has gained increasing popularity as respiratory support for newborn infants thanks to ease of use and improved patient comfort. However, its role as primary therapy for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) of prematurity needs to be further elucidated by large, randomized clinical trials.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research