Development and Validation of a Tool to Assess the Quality of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations
Author(s) -
Melissa Brouwers,
Karen Spithoff,
Kate Kerkvliet,
Pablo AlonsoCoello,
Jako Burgers,
Françoise Cluzeau,
Béatrice Fervers,
Ian D. Graham,
Jeremy Grimshaw,
Steven Hanna,
Monika Kastner,
Michelle E. Kho,
Amir Qaseem,
Sharon E. Straus,
Iván D. Flórez
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5535
Subject(s) - usability , guideline , cronbach's alpha , reliability (semiconductor) , scale (ratio) , excellence , quality (philosophy) , psychology , applied psychology , rigour , medical education , medicine , psychometrics , computer science , clinical psychology , mathematics , power (physics) , philosophy , physics , epistemology , pathology , human–computer interaction , quantum mechanics , political science , law , geometry
Key Points Question Is it possible to create a tool to specifically evaluate the quality of clinical practice guideline recommendations? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 322 international stakeholders, the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation–Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) tool was developed to appraise guidelines for clinical practice. All participants rated the tool as usable and agreed that it represents a valuable addition to the clinical practice guidelines enterprise. Meaning A panel of stakeholders agrees that the AGREE-REX tool may provide information about the methodologic quality of guideline recommendations and may help in the implementation of clinical practice guidelines.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom