Survival After Cancer Treatment at Top-Ranked US Cancer Hospitals vs Affiliates of Top-Ranked Cancer Hospitals
Author(s) -
Daniel J. Boffa,
Katherine Mallin,
Jeph Herrin,
Benjamin J. Resio,
Michelle C. Salazar,
Bryan E. Palis,
Matthew A. Facktor,
Ryan McCabe,
Heidi Nelson,
Lawrence N. Shulman
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3942
Subject(s) - medicine , cancer , interquartile range , colorectal cancer , lung cancer , logistic regression , cohort , retrospective cohort study , emergency medicine
Key Points Question Are there differences in survivorship between top-ranked cancer hospitals and affiliates that share a top-ranked hospital’s brand? Findings In this cohort study of 119 834 patients who underwent surgical treatment for esophageal, gastric, lung, pancreatic, colorectal, and bladder cancer, risk of 90-day mortality after complex cancer treatment was higher and long-term survival was inferior at affiliate hospitals. Meaning These findings suggest that quality improvement efforts are needed to address important differences in survival between top-ranked cancer hospitals and brand-sharing affiliate hospitals.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom