Comparison of Access to Primary Care Medical and Dental Appointments Between Simulated Patients Who Were Deaf and Patients Who Could Hear
Author(s) -
Elizabeth Schniedewind,
Ryan Lindsay,
Steven G. Snow
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32207
Subject(s) - interpreter , medicine , family medicine , context (archaeology) , audit , primary care , dental care , american sign language , sign language , paleontology , linguistics , philosophy , management , computer science , economics , biology , programming language
Key Points Question Are patients who can hear more likely to secure primary care medical or dental appointments than patients who are deaf? Findings In this cross-sectional study including 8 simulated patients, those who could hear were nearly 2 times more likely to secure appointments at 445 clinics than were simulated patients who were deaf. Among 80 unsuccessful requests made by simulated patients who were deaf, 48% were associated with a request for interpretation. Meaning The findings of this study suggest the patients who are deaf and request interpreter services may experience diminished access to care at primary medical and dental clinics.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom