z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluation of Concordance Between Original Death Certifications and an Expert Panel Process in the Determination of Sudden Unexplained Death in Childhood
Author(s) -
Laura Gould,
Joyce H. Lee,
Daniel Friedman,
Kelly Lear,
Katherine F. Maloney,
J. Keith Pinckard,
Peter T. Lin,
Thomas Andrew,
Kristin Roman,
Kristen Landi,
Heather S. Jarrell,
Alex Williamson,
J. C. Upshaw Downs,
Kathy Pinneri,
Christopher William,
Joseph J. Maleszewski,
R. Ross Reichard,
Orrin Devinsky
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23262
Subject(s) - concordance , certification , medicine , sudden death , tetramine , law , political science , metallurgy , materials science
Key Points Question Does the US death investigation system underestimate the frequency of sudden unexplained death in childhood (SUDC)? Findings In this case series of the SUDC Registry and Research Collaborative, 2 forensic pathologists from a pool of 13 independently reviewed 100 cases of SUDC. These reviewers were discordant with the original certifier’s cause of death opinion in 40% of cases, including 28 cases originally considered accidental or natural but adjudicated as unexplained by our review. Meaning This study suggests that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention underestimates the rate of SUDC and that there is a low rate of consistency in death certification of sudden unexpected pediatric deaths.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom