z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of Survival Rates After a Combination of Local Treatment and Systemic Therapy vs Systemic Therapy Alone for Treatment of Stage IV Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Author(s) -
Johannes Uhlig,
Meaghan Dendy Case,
Justin D. Blasberg,
Daniel J. Boffa,
Anne C. Chiang,
Scott Gettinger,
Hyun S. Kim
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9702
Subject(s) - medicine , systemic therapy , interquartile range , stage (stratigraphy) , proportional hazards model , radiofrequency ablation , lung cancer , propensity score matching , radiation therapy , oncology , cancer , surgery , ablation , breast cancer , paleontology , biology
Key Points Question Is there a survival benefit to combining local treatment and systemic therapy for stage IV non–small cell lung cancer? Findings In this comparative effectiveness research study, overall survival of patients with stage IV non–small cell lung cancer was superior for combination of systemic therapy with surgical resection or external beam radiotherapy/thermal ablation of the primary tumor site compared with systemic therapy alone. Effectiveness of external beam radiotherapy/thermal ablation varied with histologic and other tumor characteristics. Meaning In stage IV non–small cell lung cancer, surgical resection or external beam radiotherapy/thermal ablation of the primary tumor site may provide survival benefits in addition to systemic therapy alone for selected patients.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom