z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Primary Care Practices’ Ability to Report Electronic Clinical Quality Measures in the EvidenceNOW Southwest Initiative to Improve Heart Health
Author(s) -
Kyle Knierim,
Tristen Hall,
L. Miriam Dickinson,
Donald E. Nease,
Dionisia de la Cerda,
Douglas H. Fernald,
Molly J. Bleecker,
Robert L. Rhyne,
W. Perry Dickinson
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8569
Subject(s) - interquartile range , facilitator , medicine , quality management , best practice , health care , family medicine , emergency medicine , psychology , surgery , operations management , management system , social psychology , management , economics , economic growth
Key Points Question How quickly can primary care practices report electronic clinical quality measures based on evidence-based guidelines for cardiac care? Findings In this quality improvement study of 211 primary care practices, the median time to report any baseline electronic clinical quality measure was 8.2 months. Time to report varied by measure type and practice characteristics. Meaning This study suggests that clinical quality measure reporting still takes a great deal of time and effort, and as the health care system increasingly moves to value-based structures that require electronic clinical quality measures, some practices may be left behind without better incentives and support.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom