z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of Long-term Survival Benefits in Trials of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor vs Non–Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anticancer Agents Using ASCO Value Framework and ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale
Author(s) -
Louis Everest,
Monica Shah,
Kelvin Chan
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6803
Subject(s) - medicine , oncology , immunotherapy , clinical trial , clinical oncology , cancer
Key Points Question How frequently do immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) agents vs non-ICI agents qualify for American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework version 2 (ASCO-VF v2) tail-of-the-curve bonuses or European Society of Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) immunotherapy-triggered long-term plateau adjustments? Findings In this cohort study of 100 randomized clinical trials comparing ICI with non-ICI agents, ASCO-VF v2 tail-of-the-curve bonuses and ESMO-MCBS v1.1 immunotherapy-triggered long-term plateau adjustments were not awarded to ICI agents more often than non-ICI agents. Meaning The ASCO-VF v2 and ESMO-MCBS v1.1 may be flawed in accurately capturing long-term survival.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom