Comparison of Long-term Survival Benefits in Trials of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor vs Non–Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anticancer Agents Using ASCO Value Framework and ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale
Author(s) -
Louis Everest,
Monica Shah,
Kelvin Chan
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6803
Subject(s) - medicine , oncology , immunotherapy , clinical trial , clinical oncology , cancer
Key Points Question How frequently do immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) agents vs non-ICI agents qualify for American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework version 2 (ASCO-VF v2) tail-of-the-curve bonuses or European Society of Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) immunotherapy-triggered long-term plateau adjustments? Findings In this cohort study of 100 randomized clinical trials comparing ICI with non-ICI agents, ASCO-VF v2 tail-of-the-curve bonuses and ESMO-MCBS v1.1 immunotherapy-triggered long-term plateau adjustments were not awarded to ICI agents more often than non-ICI agents. Meaning The ASCO-VF v2 and ESMO-MCBS v1.1 may be flawed in accurately capturing long-term survival.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom