Association of Communication Interventions to Discuss Code Status With Patient Decisions for Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders
Author(s) -
Christoph Becker,
Leopold Lecheler,
Seraina Hochstrasser,
Kerstin Metzger,
Madlaina Widmer,
Emanuel Thommen,
Kathariienhaus,
Hannah Ewald,
Christoph A. Meier,
Florian Rueter,
Rainer Schaefert,
Stefano Bassetti,
Sabina Hunziker
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5033
Subject(s) - psychological intervention , psycinfo , medicine , cinahl , meta analysis , randomized controlled trial , medline , data extraction , subgroup analysis , clinical endpoint , nursing , law , political science
Key Points Question Is there an association between communication interventions and patient preference regarding do-not-resuscitate (DNR) code status decisions and knowledge regarding life-sustaining treatment? Findings In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the pooled meta-analysis of 11 randomized clinical trials involving 1463 patients showed a significant association between communication interventions and higher patient preference for a DNR code status. In an analysis of 5 eligible trials, communication interventions were also associated with better patient knowledge about resuscitation. Meaning Communication interventions may be an effective decision aid for code status discussions that potentially alter patient decisions regarding DNR code status and increase patient knowledge.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom