z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of Hospital Readmission After Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Spinal Surgery After Implementation of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program
Author(s) -
Ashwin Ramaswamy,
Maya Marchese,
Alexander P. Cole,
Sabrina Harmouch,
David F. Friedlander,
Joel S. Weissman,
Stuart R. Lipsitz,
Adil H. Haider,
Adam S. Kibel,
Andrew J. Schoenfeld,
QuocDien Trinh
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4634
Subject(s) - medicine , logistic regression , surgery , laminectomy , retrospective cohort study , arthroplasty , cohort , lumbar , total hip arthroplasty , physical therapy , psychiatry , spinal cord
Key Points Question Is the US Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program associated with a greater decrease in unplanned readmissions after targeted surgical procedures when compared with similar nontargeted procedures? Findings In this nationwide, all-payer cohort study of 6 687 007 weighted index surgical admissions, implementation of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program was associated with a decrease of 0.018% per month in the risk-adjusted readmission rate after targeted procedures, while the readmission rate after nontargeted procedures remained constant, a difference that was statistically significant. Meaning Readmission trends appear to be consistent with hospitals’ response to the possibility of Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program penalties after total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom