z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Appropriateness of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices in Australia
Author(s) -
Courtney Ierano,
Karin Thursky,
Caroline Marshall,
Sonia Koning,
Rod James,
Sandra Johnson,
Nabeel Imam,
Leon J. Worth,
Trisha Peel
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15003
Subject(s) - medicine , medical prescription , confidence interval , logistic regression , audit , antibiotic prophylaxis , retrospective cohort study , antimicrobial , emergency medicine , pediatrics , surgery , antibiotics , chemistry , organic chemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , economics , pharmacology , biology , management
Key Points Question What are the current surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis prescribing practices in Australia, and what factors are associated with their appropriateness? Findings This quality improvement study of 9351 surgical episodes found high rates of inappropriate procedural and postprocedural antimicrobial use across various hospital, patient, and surgical factors. The most common reason for inappropriate procedural use was incorrect timing, while duration greater than 24 hours was the most common reason for inappropriate postprocedural use. Meaning These findings suggest that the identified hospital, patient, and surgical factors should be considered as targets for development of tailored interventions to ensure appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis prescriptions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom