z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Combination Therapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States
Author(s) -
Steven D. Criss,
Meghan J. Mooradian,
Tina R. Watson,
Justin F. Gainor,
Kerry L. Reynolds,
Chung Yin Kong
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11952
Subject(s) - atezolizumab , medicine , bevacizumab , carboplatin , oncology , lung cancer , cost effectiveness , population , pembrolizumab , chemotherapy , cancer , cisplatin , immunotherapy , risk analysis (engineering) , environmental health
Key Points Question Is atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (atezolizumab combination) cost-effective as a first-line treatment strategy for US patients with metastatic nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer? Findings In this economic evaluation of 1 million simulated patients with metastatic nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer, adding atezolizumab to bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel was not cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per quality-adjusted life-year, compared with bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel alone. Atezolizumab combination also provided suboptimal incremental benefit compared with cost vs pembrolizumab combination for first-line treatment. Meaning Although atezolizumab combination therapy provides clinical benefit, price reductions may be necessary for this treatment strategy to become cost-effective.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom