Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Combination Therapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States
Author(s) -
Steven D. Criss,
Meghan J. Mooradian,
Tina R. Watson,
Justin F. Gainor,
Kerry L. Reynolds,
Chung Yin Kong
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11952
Subject(s) - atezolizumab , medicine , bevacizumab , carboplatin , oncology , lung cancer , cost effectiveness , population , pembrolizumab , chemotherapy , cancer , cisplatin , immunotherapy , risk analysis (engineering) , environmental health
Key Points Question Is atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (atezolizumab combination) cost-effective as a first-line treatment strategy for US patients with metastatic nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer? Findings In this economic evaluation of 1 million simulated patients with metastatic nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer, adding atezolizumab to bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel was not cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per quality-adjusted life-year, compared with bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel alone. Atezolizumab combination also provided suboptimal incremental benefit compared with cost vs pembrolizumab combination for first-line treatment. Meaning Although atezolizumab combination therapy provides clinical benefit, price reductions may be necessary for this treatment strategy to become cost-effective.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom