z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Women’s Attitudes Toward Invasive and Noninvasive Testing When Facing a High Risk of Fetal Down Syndrome
Author(s) -
Valérie Seror,
Olivier L’Haridon,
L. Bussières,
Valérie Malan,
N. Fries,
Michel Vekemans,
Laurent Salomon,
Y. Ville
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1062
Subject(s) - medicine , logistic regression , odds ratio , cluster (spacecraft) , obstetrics , pregnancy , odds , randomization , gestation , randomized controlled trial , prenatal screening , prenatal diagnosis , family medicine , gynecology , demography , fetus , biology , computer science , genetics , programming language , sociology
Key Points Question What are the attitudes and decision making concerning invasive and noninvasive prenatal testing in women at high risk of fetal Down syndrome? Findings In a survey study of 2436 pregnant women in France participating in a randomized clinical trial, 4 clusters were identified with different attitudes toward risk taking and extent of information seeking. Decision making was in line with attitudes, and clinical and socioeconomic factors were likely associated with the attitudes identified. Meaning Aversion to ambiguity generated by incomplete information from noninvasive testing as well as aversion to risk of pregnancy loss due to invasive testing played a major role in shaping attitudes and decision making; therefore, pregnant women should receive extensive information on targeted abnormalities by both tests to aid informed decision making.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom