z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Association Between Financial Incentives and Participant Deception About Study Eligibility
Author(s) -
Holly Fernandez Lynch,
Steven Joffe,
Harsha Thirumurthy,
Dawei Xie,
Emily A. Largent
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7355
Subject(s) - payment , incentive , deception , psychological intervention , medicine , vaccination , randomized controlled trial , family medicine , psychology , finance , social psychology , business , nursing , economics , immunology , microeconomics
Key Points Question Is payment associated with participant deception about research eligibility and, if so, is higher payment associated with more deception? Findings In this randomized survey experiment of a nationally representative sample of 2275 US adults, offers of payment to participate in an online survey were associated with substantial deception by participants about their eligibility compared with the control condition, with estimated proportions of ineligible individuals who engaged in deception ranging from 10.5% to 22.8%. Larger payments were not associated with increased rates of deception. Meaning Payment may be associated with deception about eligibility for study participation, but higher payment may not lead to higher rates of deception.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom