United States State-Level Variation in the Use of Neuraxial Analgesia During Labor for Pregnant Women
Author(s) -
Alexander J. Butwick,
Jason Bentley,
Cynthia A. Wong,
Jonathan M. Snowden,
Eric Sun,
Nan Guo
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6567
Subject(s) - variation (astronomy) , obstetrics , medicine , state (computer science) , pregnancy , anesthesia , computer science , physics , biology , genetics , algorithm , astrophysics
Key Points Question Does the prevalence of neuraxial labor analgesia vary across US states? Findings In this population-based, cross-sectional analysis of 2 625 950 pregnant women who underwent labor, Maine had the lowest adjusted neuraxial analgesia prevalence (36.6%) and Nevada the highest (80.1%). The odds of receiving neuraxial analgesia were 1.5-fold higher if the same patient received neuraxial analgesia in a high-use vs a low-use state; and 5.4% of the overall variation in neuraxial analgesia prevalence is explained by US state. Meaning Results of this study suggest that wide variation exists in neuraxial analgesia use across US states, with a small portion of the overall variation explained by US states.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom