Comparison of 2 Natural Language Processing Methods for Identification of Bleeding Among Critically Ill Patients
Author(s) -
Maxwell Taggart,
Wendy W. Chapman,
Benjamin A. Steinberg,
Shane Ruckel,
Arianna Pregenzer-Wenzler,
Yishuai Du,
Jeffrey P. Ferraro,
Brian T. Bucher,
Donald M. LloydJones,
Matthew T. Rondina,
Rashmee U. Shah
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3451
Subject(s) - set (abstract data type) , artificial intelligence , test set , computer science , identification (biology) , machine learning , health care , convolutional neural network , intensive care , medicine , natural language processing , intensive care medicine , botany , biology , programming language , economics , economic growth
Key Points Question Can a natural language processing approach that uses text from clinical notes identify bleeding events among critically ill patients? Findings In this diagnostic study of a rules-based natural language processing model to identify bleeding events using clinical notes, the model was superior to a machine learning approach, with high sensitivity and negative predictive value. The extra trees machine learning model had high sensitivity but poor positive predictive value. Meaning Bleeding complications can be detected with a high-throughput natural language processing algorithm, an approach that can be used for quality improvement and prevention programs.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom