z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of Populations Served in Hospital Service Areas With and Without Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Medical Homes
Author(s) -
Taressa Fraze,
Elliott S. Fisher,
Marisa Tomaino,
Kristen A. Peck,
Ellen Meara
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2169
Subject(s) - medicaid , census , interquartile range , medicine , family medicine , demographics , population , health care , service (business) , primary care , best practice , environmental health , business , demography , political science , law , surgery , marketing , sociology
Key Points Question What type of primary care practices join the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus program, and which patient populations do those practices serve? Findings This comparative cross-sectional study of 756 areas eligible for the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus program found that a diverse set of primary care practices joined the program. Practices located in wealthier areas with higher education levels and less use of inpatient services were more likely to join. Meaning Voluntary advanced primary care medical home models, such as the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus program, may leave behind practices serving vulnerable populations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom