z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Patterns of Immediate-Release and Extended-Release Opioid Analgesic Use in the Management of Chronic Pain, 2003-2014
Author(s) -
Catherine S. Hwang,
Elizabeth M. Kang,
Yulan Ding,
Josephine OcranAppiah,
Jana McAninch,
Judy A. Staffa,
Cynthia Kornegay,
Tamra E. Meyer
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
jama network open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.278
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2574-3805
DOI - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0216
Subject(s) - analgesic , opioid , chronic pain , pain management , anesthesia , medicine , psychiatry , receptor
Key Points Question What percentage of patients receiving long-term immediate-release (IR) opioid analgesic therapy in the United States adds or switches to an extended-release/long-acting (ER/LA) formulation? Findings In this cohort study, most patients (96.0%) receiving IR formulations for 90 days or longer continued IR opioid analgesic use without adding (3.3%) or switching (0.7%) to an ER/LA product. Furthermore, many patients received only 1 IR (40%) and/or 1 ER/LA (41%) prescription throughout the 12-year study period. Meaning Most patients receiving opioid analgesics use IR formulations, and patients receiving long-term IR opioid analgesic therapy are unlikely to add or switch to an ER/LA formulation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom