z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prevalence of Potentially Unnecessary Bimanual Pelvic Examinations and Papanicolaou Tests Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States
Author(s) -
Jin Qin,
Mona Saraiya,
Gladys Martinez,
George F. Sawaya
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jama internal medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.14
H-Index - 342
eISSN - 2168-6114
pISSN - 2168-6106
DOI - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5727
Subject(s) - medicine , overdiagnosis , population , pelvic examination , asymptomatic , cross sectional study , pediatrics , national health and nutrition examination survey , obstetrics , young adult , papanicolaou stain , demography , gynecology , cervical cancer , gerontology , surgery , cancer , environmental health , pathology , sociology
Pelvic examination is no longer recommended for asymptomatic, nonpregnant women and may cause harms such as false-positive test results, overdiagnosis, anxiety, and unnecessary costs. The bimanual pelvic examination (BPE) is an invasive and controversial examination component. Cervical cancer screening is not recommended for women younger than 21 years.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom