Comparison of the Harms, Advantages, and Costs Associated With Alternative Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hematuria | Zendy

Mihaela Georgieva | Zendy; Stephanie B. Wheeler | Zendy; Daniel O. Erim | Zendy; Rebecca SmithBindman | Zendy; Ronald K. Loo | Zendy; Casey K. Ng | Zendy; Tullika Garg | Zendy; Mathew Raynor | Zendy; Matthew E. Nielsen | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Comparison of the Harms, Advantages, and Costs Associated With Alternative Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hematuria

Author(s) -

Mihaela Georgieva,

Stephanie B. Wheeler,

Daniel O. Erim,

Rebecca SmithBindman,

Ronald K. Loo,

Casey K. Ng,

Tullika Garg,

Mathew Raynor,

Matthew E. Nielsen

Publication year - 2019

Publication title -

jama internal medicine

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 5.14

H-Index - 342

eISSN - 2168-6114

pISSN - 2168-6106

DOI - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2280

Subject(s) - medicine , cystoscopy , cohort , urinary system , pyelogram , cohort study , radiology , surgery

Existing recommendations for the diagnostic testing of hematuria range from uniform evaluation of varying intensity to patient-level risk stratification. Concerns have been raised about not only the costs and advantages of computed tomography (CT) scans but also the potential harms of CT radiation exposure.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research