Noninvasive Cardiac Testing vs Clinical Evaluation Alone in Acute Chest Pain | Zendy

Samuel W. Reinhardt | Zendy; Chien-Jung Lin | Zendy; Eric Novak | Zendy; David Brown | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Noninvasive Cardiac Testing vs Clinical Evaluation Alone in Acute Chest Pain

Author(s) -

Samuel W. Reinhardt,

Chien-Jung Lin,

Eric Novak,

David Brown

Publication year - 2017

Publication title -

jama internal medicine

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 5.14

H-Index - 342

eISSN - 2168-6114

pISSN - 2168-6106

DOI - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7360

Subject(s) - medicine , chest pain , stress testing (software) , emergency department , mace , myocardial infarction , acute coronary syndrome , revascularization , clinical trial , randomized controlled trial , clinical endpoint , conventional pci , psychiatry , computer science , programming language

The incremental benefit of noninvasive testing in addition to clinical evaluation (history, physical examination, an electrocardiogram [ECG], and biomarker assessment) vs clinical evaluation alone for patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain is unknown.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research