Association Between Uncemented vs Cemented Hemiarthroplasty and Revision Surgery Among Patients With Hip Fracture | Zendy

Kanu Okike | Zendy; Priscilla H. Chan | Zendy; Heather A. Prentice | Zendy; Elizabeth W. Paxton | Zendy; Robert A. Burri | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Association Between Uncemented vs Cemented Hemiarthroplasty and Revision Surgery Among Patients With Hip Fracture

Author(s) -

Kanu Okike,

Priscilla H. Chan,

Heather A. Prentice,

Elizabeth W. Paxton,

Robert A. Burri

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

jama

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 4.688

H-Index - 680

eISSN - 1538-3598

pISSN - 0098-7484

DOI - 10.1001/jama.2020.1067

Subject(s) - medicine , hip fracture , retrospective cohort study , surgery , cohort study , femoral neck , fixation (population genetics) , cohort , implant , arthroplasty , femoral fracture , femur , population , osteoporosis , environmental health

Consensus guidelines and systematic reviews have suggested that cemented fixation is more effective than uncemented fixation in hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. Given that these recommendations are based on research performed outside the United States, it is uncertain whether these findings also reflect the US experience.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research