Effect of a Low vs Intermediate Tidal Volume Strategy on Ventilator-Free Days in Intensive Care Unit Patients Without ARDS
Author(s) -
Fabienne D. Simonis,
Ary Serpa Neto,
Jan M. Binnekade,
Annemarije Braber,
Karina Bruin,
Rogier M. Determann,
Geert-Jan Goekoop,
J Heidt,
Janneke Horn,
Gerard Innemee,
Evert de Jonge,
Nicole P. Juffermans,
Peter E. Spronk,
Lotte Steuten,
Pieter R. Tuinman,
Rob B. P. de Wilde,
Marijn Vriends,
Marcelo Gama de Abreu,
Paolo Pelosi,
Marcus J. Schultz
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
jama
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.688
H-Index - 680
eISSN - 1538-3598
pISSN - 0098-7484
DOI - 10.1001/jama.2018.14280
Subject(s) - medicine , ards , interquartile range , tidal volume , intensive care unit , mechanical ventilation , ventilation (architecture) , atelectasis , randomized controlled trial , intensive care , anesthesia , emergency medicine , intensive care medicine , lung , respiratory system , mechanical engineering , engineering
It remains uncertain whether invasive ventilation should use low tidal volumes in critically ill patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom