Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients | Zendy

Gonzalo Hernández | Zendy; Concepción Vaquero | Zendy; Paloma González Arenas | Zendy; Carlés Subirá | Zendy; Fernando Frutos–Vivar | Zendy; Gemma Rialp | Zendy; César Laborda | Zendy; Laura Colinas | Zendy; Rafael Cuena | Zendy; Rafael Fernández | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients

Author(s) -

Gonzalo Hernández,

Concepción Vaquero,

Paloma González Arenas,

Carlés Subirá,

Fernando Frutos–Vivar,

Gemma Rialp,

César Laborda,

Laura Colinas,

Rafael Cuena,

Rafael Fernández

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

jama

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 4.688

H-Index - 680

eISSN - 1538-3598

pISSN - 0098-7484

DOI - 10.1001/jama.2016.2711

Subject(s) - medicine , nasal cannula , mechanical ventilation , oxygen therapy , anesthesia , respiratory failure , hypoxemia , randomized controlled trial , cannula , intensive care medicine , surgery

Studies of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients that combine populations that are at high and low risk for reintubation suggest that conditioned high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy after extubation improves oxygenation compared with conventional oxygen therapy. However, conclusive data about reintubation are lacking.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research