Geographic Variation in Cardiovascular Procedure Use Among Medicare Fee-for-Service vs Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries
Author(s) -
Daniel D. Matlock,
Peter W. Groeneveld,
Stephen Sidney,
Susan Shetterly,
Glenn K. Goodrich,
Karen A. Glenn,
Stan Xu,
Lin Yang,
Steven A. Farmer,
Kristi Reynolds,
Andrea E. CassidyBushrow,
Tracy A. Lieu,
Denise M. Boudreau,
Robert T. Greenlee,
Jeffrey Tom,
Suma Vupputuri,
Kenneth Adams,
David H. Smith,
Marc J. Gunter,
Alan S. Go,
David J. Magid
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
jama
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.688
H-Index - 680
eISSN - 1538-3598
pISSN - 0098-7484
DOI - 10.1001/jama.2013.7837
Subject(s) - medicine , conventional pci , percutaneous coronary intervention , medicare advantage , fee for service , coronary angiography , reimbursement , angiography , cardiology , referral , emergency medicine , myocardial infarction , health care , family medicine , economics , economic growth
Little is known about how different financial incentives between Medicare Advantage and Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) reimbursement structures influence use of cardiovascular procedures.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom