z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Geographic Variation in Cardiovascular Procedure Use Among Medicare Fee-for-Service vs Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries
Author(s) -
Daniel D. Matlock,
Peter W. Groeneveld,
Stephen Sidney,
Susan Shetterly,
Glenn K. Goodrich,
Karen A. Glenn,
Stan Xu,
Lin Yang,
Steven A. Farmer,
Kristi Reynolds,
Andrea E. CassidyBushrow,
Tracy A. Lieu,
Denise M. Boudreau,
Robert T. Greenlee,
Jeffrey Tom,
Suma Vupputuri,
Kenneth Adams,
David H. Smith,
Marc J. Gunter,
Alan S. Go,
David J. Magid
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
jama
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.688
H-Index - 680
eISSN - 1538-3598
pISSN - 0098-7484
DOI - 10.1001/jama.2013.7837
Subject(s) - medicine , conventional pci , percutaneous coronary intervention , medicare advantage , fee for service , coronary angiography , reimbursement , angiography , cardiology , referral , emergency medicine , myocardial infarction , health care , family medicine , economics , economic growth
Little is known about how different financial incentives between Medicare Advantage and Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) reimbursement structures influence use of cardiovascular procedures.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom