z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Why Some Dermatologists Do Not Practice Store-and-Forward Teledermatology
Author(s) -
April W. Armstrong,
Mei Wa Kwong,
Elizabeth P. Chase,
Lynda Ledo,
Thomas S. Nesbitt,
Sandra Shewry
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
archives of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1538-3652
pISSN - 0003-987X
DOI - 10.1001/archdermatol.2012.42
Subject(s) - teledermatology , medicine , dermatology , store and forward , telemedicine , health care , computer science , economics , economic growth , computer network
N umerous studies comparing store-andforward (S&F) teledermatology with conventional, face-to-face care have shown several advantages of S&F teledermatology, including improved patient access, comparable diagnostic accuracy, costeffective care, and remote medical education. However, despite these reported benefits of teledermatology in the medical literature, the pace of adoption for S&F teledermatology in the United States has not been as rapid as it might be. Perception of teledermatology by dermatologists who do not practice it is unknown in the United States. This is an important area of investigation because the findings could help identify areas of opportunity to increase teledermatology adoption in the dermatology community at large.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom