z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Topical Aprepitant in Clinical and Experimental Pruritus
Author(s) -
Joanna Wallengren
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
archives of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1538-3652
pISSN - 0003-987X
DOI - 10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1018
Subject(s) - aprepitant , medicine , dermatology , vomiting , antiemetic
Comment. While privately insured patients enjoyed a 91% acceptance rate and relatively shorter wait times, the publicly insured patients faced significantly lower acceptance rates and longer appointment wait times. Despite making up less than 20% of the workforce, academic dermatologists provide most of the care for Medicaid patients in Ohio. Not only does this limit access to care for the publicly insured, but it also places significant strain on academic dermatology. In addition, the lower reimbursement, and resulting lower physician compensation, may make it more difficult for academic centers to recruit and retain faculty. The burden faced by academic dermatologists is evident in the data—with an average wait time almost twice that of private dermatologists. With implementation of the health care reform bill and expansion of Medicaid eligibility, longer appointment wait times are inevitable, not only for those with public insurance, but also for those who need the subspecialty care that is often available only at academic centers.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom