Comparing the Efficacy of an In-Person Intervention With a Skin Self-examination Workbook
Author(s) -
June K. Robinson,
Rob Turrisi,
Kimberly A. Mallett,
Jerod L. Stapleton,
Maliya Pion
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
archives of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1538-3652
pISSN - 0003-987X
DOI - 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.350
Subject(s) - workbook , medicine , psychological intervention , intervention (counseling) , dialog box , physical examination , surgery , nursing , world wide web , accounting , business , computer science
From 1992 to 2004, melanoma incidence for all categories of tumor thickness increased 3.1% annually, and there was a 3.8% annual increase in the thickest cancers (Breslow depth, >4 mm), which have the least favorable prognosis.1–3 Since most melanomas are discovered by the patient or a partner, skin self-examination (SSE) with the assistance of a partner has the potential to improve long-term survival.4–6 Given the challenge of examining difficult-to-see body areas (eg, the back), partner assistance is important.7 By creating a workbook from our experience with 130 in-person interventions that increased SSE and partner-assisted skin examination (PASE),7–9 we extend our group's previous research. The workbook codifies the dialog of the in-person intervention with exercises that amplify skills and provide a framework for the patient and partner to understand the significance of melanoma by “story telling” about other people with melanoma in a way that is a call to action. Herein, we compare the efficacy of the workbook with that of in-person training.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom