z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparing the Efficacy of an In-Person Intervention With a Skin Self-examination Workbook
Author(s) -
June K. Robinson,
Rob Turrisi,
Kimberly A. Mallett,
Jerod L. Stapleton,
Maliya Pion
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
archives of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1538-3652
pISSN - 0003-987X
DOI - 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.350
Subject(s) - workbook , medicine , psychological intervention , intervention (counseling) , dialog box , physical examination , surgery , nursing , world wide web , accounting , business , computer science
From 1992 to 2004, melanoma incidence for all categories of tumor thickness increased 3.1% annually, and there was a 3.8% annual increase in the thickest cancers (Breslow depth, >4 mm), which have the least favorable prognosis.1–3 Since most melanomas are discovered by the patient or a partner, skin self-examination (SSE) with the assistance of a partner has the potential to improve long-term survival.4–6 Given the challenge of examining difficult-to-see body areas (eg, the back), partner assistance is important.7 By creating a workbook from our experience with 130 in-person interventions that increased SSE and partner-assisted skin examination (PASE),7–9 we extend our group's previous research. The workbook codifies the dialog of the in-person intervention with exercises that amplify skills and provide a framework for the patient and partner to understand the significance of melanoma by “story telling” about other people with melanoma in a way that is a call to action. Herein, we compare the efficacy of the workbook with that of in-person training.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom