z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
No significant difference in clinically relevant findings between Pillcam® SB3 and Pillcam® SB2 capsules in a United States veteran population
Author(s) -
Tyler Aasen,
David Wilhoite,
Aynur Rahman,
Kalpit Devani,
Mark Young,
James Swenson
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
world journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1948-5190
DOI - 10.4253/wjge.v11.i2.124
Subject(s) - medicine , capsule endoscopy , capsule , population , obscure gastrointestinal bleeding , surgery , gastroenterology , botany , environmental health , biology
Capsule endoscopy (CE) allows for a non-invasive small bowel evaluation for a wide range of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and diseases. Capsule technology has been rapidly advancing over recent years, often improving image frequency and quality. The Pillcam ® SB3 (SB3) capsule is one such technology that offers an adaptive frame rate advantage over the previous versions of the capsule the Pillcam ® SB2 (SB2). Some have proposed that this improvement in capsule technology may lead to increased diagnostic yields; however, real world clinical data is currently lacking.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here