z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of channel sampling methods and brush heads in surveillance culture of endoscope reprocessing: A propensity score matching and paired study
Author(s) -
Xue-Yue Ji,
Peiyong Ning,
Chun-Nan Fei,
Jia Song,
Dou Xuemei,
Nannan Zhang,
Jun Liu,
He Li
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
the saudi journal of gastroenterology/saudi journal of gastroenterology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.608
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1998-4049
pISSN - 1319-3767
DOI - 10.4103/sjg.sjg_437_21
Subject(s) - medicine , propensity score matching , sampling (signal processing) , confidence interval , statistics , brush , matching (statistics) , logistic regression , surgery , pathology , mathematics , computer science , filter (signal processing) , computer vision , electrical engineering , engineering
Endoscopy-related infections have caused multiple outbreaks. The importance of surveillance culture is gradually recognized, but sampling techniques are not consistent in many guidelines. It is unclear whether the Flush-Brush-Flush sampling method (FBFSM) is more sensitive than the conventional flush sampling method (CFSM) and whether different sampling brushes have different effects.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here