z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Is typifying systematic reviews and meta-analysis as the top on the ladder justified?
Author(s) -
Sunil Kumar Raina,
Raman Kumar
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of family medicine and primary care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2278-7135
pISSN - 2249-4863
DOI - 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2367_21
Subject(s) - medicine , meta analysis , systematic review , raising (metalworking) , medline , law and economics , law , economics , pathology , geometry , mathematics , political science
A large number-possibly the large majority-of systematic reviews and meta-analyses produced to date may not be useful for various reasons. This article though not ruling out the usefulness of these, is raising concerns on the way these are conducted or intended for in terms of outcomes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here