z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Low-risk prostate cancer in India: Is active surveillance a valid treatment option?
Author(s) -
Shanky Singh,
Sunil Patil,
Ashwin Sunil Tamhankar,
P. K. Ahluwalia,
Gagan Gautam
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
indian journal of urology/indian journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.333
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1998-3824
pISSN - 0970-1591
DOI - 10.4103/iju.iju_37_20
Subject(s) - medicine , prostatectomy , prostate cancer , stage (stratigraphy) , malignancy , incidence (geometry) , prostate , prostate specific antigen , prostate carcinoma , cancer , urology , gynecology , paleontology , physics , optics , biology
Carcinoma prostate is considered highly aggressive in Asian countries such as India. This raises an argument whether active surveillance (AS) gives a false sense of security as opposed to upfront radical prostatectomy (RP) in Indian males with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). We analyzed our prospectively maintained robot-assisted RP (RARP) database to address this question.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here