
I-Gel as an intubation conduit: Comparison of three different types of endotracheal tubes
Author(s) -
Nitin Choudhary,
Abhijit Kumar,
Amit Kohli,
Sonia Wadhawan,
Poonam Bhadoria
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
indian journal of anaesthesia/indian journal of anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.645
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 0976-2817
pISSN - 0019-5049
DOI - 10.4103/ija.ija_615_18
Subject(s) - medicine , intubation , endotracheal tube , anesthesia , airway management , endotracheal intubation , airway , american society of anesthesiologists , surgery
I-Gel ® , a novel SAD has been introduced as a ventilating device but has widely gained popularity as conduit for intubation. Unlike intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA), I-Gel ® does not have an endotracheal tube specially designed for it. Hence the aim of this study was to compare the rate of successful intubation via I-Gel ® using three different types of endotracheal tubes.