z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
I-Gel as an intubation conduit: Comparison of three different types of endotracheal tubes
Author(s) -
Nitin Choudhary,
Abhijit Kumar,
Amit Kohli,
Sonia Wadhawan,
Poonam Bhadoria
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
indian journal of anaesthesia/indian journal of anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.645
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 0976-2817
pISSN - 0019-5049
DOI - 10.4103/ija.ija_615_18
Subject(s) - medicine , intubation , endotracheal tube , anesthesia , airway management , endotracheal intubation , airway , american society of anesthesiologists , surgery
I-Gel ® , a novel SAD has been introduced as a ventilating device but has widely gained popularity as conduit for intubation. Unlike intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA), I-Gel ® does not have an endotracheal tube specially designed for it. Hence the aim of this study was to compare the rate of successful intubation via I-Gel ® using three different types of endotracheal tubes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here