z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Pitfalls in article submissions for publication
Author(s) -
Brijesh Nair
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
indian dermatology online journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2249-5673
pISSN - 2229-5178
DOI - 10.4103/idoj.idoj_658_20
Subject(s) - conceptualization , publication , checklist , medicine , selection (genetic algorithm) , function (biology) , publishing , medline , computer science , law , psychology , cognitive psychology , artificial intelligence , political science , evolutionary biology , biology
The aim of every academician and clinical dermatologist is to publish their research in reputed biomedical journals. But from conceptualization to completion, myriad shortcomings creep into the article and by the time it is ready for publication, by default and certainly not by design, the article discourse gets flawed, sometime fatally so. The endeavor of this article is to discuss these pitfalls from conceptualization, statistical machinations, authorial misconcepts, article structuring, and final journal selection. The article can function as a prophylactic checklist, albeit not comprehensive, by any prospective author and is an appreciation of the most oft repeated fallacies usually detected in publication submissions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here