z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
No effect of abstinence time on nerve electrophysiological test in premature ejaculation patients
Author(s) -
Bingyi Yang,
Jun Xia,
Zhiwei Hong,
Zheng Zhang,
Yan Han,
Yun Chen,
Yutian Dai
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
asian journal of andrology/asian journal of andrology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.701
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1745-7262
pISSN - 1008-682X
DOI - 10.4103/aja.aja_10_18
Subject(s) - electrophysiology , ejaculation , medicine , somatosensory evoked potential , premature ejaculation , anesthesia , abstinence , penis , evoked potential , somatosensory system , audiology , psychology , anatomy , psychiatry , psychoanalysis
The nerve electrophysiological tests may differentiate the treatment of primary premature ejaculation (PPE) in our previous studies. However, no study verifies if the results will be affected by abstinence time. From January to December in 2016, fifty PPE patients ejaculated within 2 min and 28 control subjects were enrolled. The nerve electrophysiological tests, including dorsal nerve somatosensory evoked potential (DNSEP), glans penis somatosensory evoked potential (GPSEP), and penile sympathetic skin response (PSSR), were recorded before and immediately after ejaculation. The abstinence day was not correlated with the latencies of SEPs or PSSR neither in PE group (P = 0.170, 0.064, and 0.122, respectively) nor in control group (P = 0.996, 0.475, and 0.904, respectively). No statistically differences were found in the latencies of SEPs and PSSR before and after ejaculation in PE patients (P = 0.439, 0.537, and 0.576, respectively) or control subjects (P = 0.102, 0.198, and 0.363, respectively). Thus, abstinence time does not interfere with the nerve electrophysiological test, which is stable in determining the nerve function of PPE patients.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here