Open Access
Comparison of serum creatinine-based estimating equations with gates protocol for predicting glomerular filtration rate in indian population
Author(s) -
Atul Mulay,
Shefali Gokhale
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
indian journal of nephrology/indian journal of nephrology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.317
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1998-3662
pISSN - 0971-4065
DOI - 10.4103/0971-4065.200515
Subject(s) - medicine , renal function , creatinine , urology , protocol (science) , population , pathology , environmental health , alternative medicine
In clinical practice, serum creatinine-based predicting equations and Gates protocol based on gamma camera imaging of kidneys after injection of Tc99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) are commonly used to assess glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Comparison of these methods, especially the chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation with gold standard method of assessment of GFR by plasma clearance of Tc-99mDTPA is not well-studied in Indian population. We conducted this study to compare GFR estimation by gamma camera-based Gates protocol and serum creatinine-based predicting equations with GFR measured by plasma clearance of Tc-99mDTPA. One hundred and five patients (65 male and 40 female) underwent Tc-99m DTPA renal scan followed by withdrawal of venous blood samples at 2, 3, and 4 h as per predefined protocol. Gates method GFR (GFR s ) was assessed using standard protocol. GFR by plasma sampling (GFR p ) was calculated by slope-intercept method with provision for corrections. Estimated GFR was calculated by Cockroft-Gault formula, four variable modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation, and CKD-EPI equation (GFR CG, GFR MDRD , GFR CKD-EPI , respectively). GFR measured by gold standard method (GFR p ) was compared with that estimated by other methods by calculating correlation coefficient, bias, precision, and accuracy. GFR estimated by all three estimating equations correlated better than GFR s with GFR p. For estimating GFR p , GFR CKD-EPI had highest correlation with GFR p with least bias and highest precision. Gamma camera-based Gates protocol was the least precise and least accurate method for estimating GFR p . To conclude, all three estimating equations based on serum creatinine are superior to Tc-99m DTPA scintigraphy for estimating GFR; CKD-EPI equation being the most accurate and precise.