English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper has organized a heart disease-related dataset from UCI repository. The organized dataset describes variables correlations with class-level target variables. This experiment has analyzed the variables by different machine learning algorithms. The authors have considered prediction-based previous work and finds some machine learning algorithms did not properly work or do not cover 100% classification accuracy with overfitting, underfitting, noisy data, residual errors on base level decision tree. This research has used Pearson correlation and chi-square features selection-based algorithms for heart disease attributes correlation strength. The main objective of this research to achieved highest classification accuracy with fewer errors. So, the authors have used parallel and sequential ensemble methods to reduce above drawback in prediction. The parallel and serial ensemble methods were organized by J48 algorithm, reduced error pruning, and decision stump algorithm decision tree-based algorithms. This paper has used random forest ensemble method for parallel randomly selection in prediction and various sequential ensemble methods such as AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost Meta classifiers. In this paper, the experiment divides into two parts: The first part deals with J48, reduced error pruning and decision stump and generated a random forest ensemble method. This parallel ensemble method calculated high classification accuracy 100% with low error. The second part of the experiment deals with J48, reduced error pruning, and decision stump with three sequential ensemble methods, namely AdaBoostM1, XG Boost, and Gradient Boosting. The XG Boost ensemble method calculated better results or high classification accuracy and low error compare to AdaBoostM1 and Gradient Boosting ensemble methods. The XG Boost ensemble method calculated 98.05% classification accuracy, but random forest ensemble method calculated high classification accuracy 100% with low error.

Analysis of Heart Disease Using Parallel and Sequential Ensemble Methods With Feature Selection Techniques: Heart Disease Prediction