Open AccessRecurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Author(s) -
Carola Rotermund,
Roupen Djinbachian,
Mahsa Taghiakbari,
Markus D. Enderle,
Axel Eickhoff,
Daniel von Renteln
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
world journal of gastroenterology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.427
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 2219-2840
pISSN - 1007-9327
DOI - 10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.4007
Subject(s) - medicine , endoscopic mucosal resection , polypectomy , resection margin , meta analysis , prospective cohort study , colorectal polyp , colonoscopy , surgery , endoscopy , gastroenterology , colorectal cancer , resection , cancer
Complete polyp resection is the main goal of endoscopic removal of large colonic polyps. Resection techniques have evolved in recent years and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with margin ablation, cold snare polypectomy (CSP), cold EMR, and underwater EMR have been introduced. Yet, efficacy of these techniques with regard to local recurrence rates (LRRs) vs traditional hot snare polypectomy and standard EMR remains unclear.