English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

With the spread of multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and the lack of effective antibiotics to treat them, developing new therapeutic methods and strategies is essential. In this study, we evaluated the antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of different formulations composed of ibuprofen (IBP), acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DXP) in combination with ciprofloxacin (CIP), gentamicin (GEN), cefepime (FEP), imipenem (IPM), and meropenem (MEM) on clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus ( S. aureus ) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( P. aeruginosa ) as well as the transcription levels of biofilm-associated genes in the presence of sub-MICs of IBP, ASA, and DXP. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), minimal biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBICs), and minimum biofilm eradication concentrations (MBECs) of CIP, GEN, FEP, IPM, and MEM with/without sub-MICs of IBP (200 µg/mL), ASA (200 µg/mL), and DXP (500 µg/mL) for the clinical isolates were determined by the microbroth dilution method. Quantitative real-time-PCR (qPCR) was used to determine the expression levels of biofilm-related genes, including icaA in S. aureus and algD in P. aeruginosa at sub-MICs of IBP, ASA, and DXP. All S. aureus isolates were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and all P. aeruginosa were resistant to carbapenems. IBP decreased the levels of MIC, MBIC, and MBEC for all antibiotic agents in both clinical isolates, except for FEP among P. aeruginosa isolates. In MRSA isolates, ASA decreased the MICs of GEN, FEP, and IPM and the MBICs of IPM and MEM. In P. aeruginosa , ASA decreased the MICs of FEP, IPM, and MEM, the MBICs of FEP and MEM, and the MBEC of FEP. DXP increased the MICs of CIP, GEN, and FEP, and the MBICs of CIP, GEN, and FEP among both clinical isolates. The MBECs of CIP and FEP for MRSA isolates and the MBECs of CIP, GEN, and MEM among P. aeruginosa isolates increased in the presence of DXP. IBP and ASA at 200 µg/mL significantly decreased the transcription level of algD in P. aeruginosa , and IBP significantly decreased the transcription level of icaA in S. aureus . DXP at 500 µg/mL significantly increased the expression levels of algD and icaA genes in S. aureus and P. aeruginosa isolates, respectively. Our findings showed that the formulations containing ASA and IBP have significant effects on decreasing the MIC, MBIC, and MBEC levels of some antibiotics and can down-regulate the expression of biofilm-related genes such as icaA and algD . Therefore, NSAIDs represent appropriate candidates for the design of new antibacterial and antibiofilm therapeutic formulations.

pharmaceutics

Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Effects of Combinatorial Treatment Formulations of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs—Common Antibiotics against Pathogenic Bacteria