English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background and Aims: Upper cross syndrome is a type of muscle- skeletal disorder that leads to shortening of the anterior muscles and weakness of the posterior muscles at neck and thorax. One of the common methods in correcting these malalignment is corrective exercises. So far, different approaches have been used to correct this malalignment. Given the physical distance during epidemics and the lack of participation in correctional programs, there is the question of whether distance training approaches can be as effective as face-to-face training. Materials and Methods: The present study was semi-experimental with pre-test and post-test design. In the present study, 60 female employees were selected and assigned to four groups randomly. The first experimental group performed corrective exercises. The second experimental group performed postural reeducation training at home during the same period of the training program, and the third group performed combination exercises and the fourth group was considered as control. Before and after the intervention of the forward head angle, the kyphosis and rounded shoulders of the individuals were measured. In data analysis, a significant level of 0.05 was used. Results: All three experimental groups showed a significant difference before and after the intervention on the forward head angle, kyphosis and rounded shoulder. (p˂0.05) The results also showed that the rate of improvement in the combined training group was higher than of two training groups. Conclusion: According to the test of research hypotheses on the effectiveness of corrective exercise and postural reeducation training on upper cross syndrome, probably combined exercises are more effective than independent corrective and postural reeducation training. Therefore, it is recommended to trainers and corrective exercise specialists that correctional exercises It is not limited to the clinical environment and in addition is combined with postural reeducation training at home to get better results.

ṭibb-i tavānbakhshī

Comparison of the Effect of the Eight-week Corrective Exercises Program, Postural Reeducation, and Combined Training on Women With Upper Cross Syndrome: With Emphasis On Physical Distance Conditions