
THERE IS A NEW KID ON THE BLOCK. IS THERE ANYTHING MISSING IN THE IBA RULES THAT IS PROVIDED IN THE PRAGUE RULES?
Author(s) -
Ioan Schiau,
AUTHOR_ID
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
bulletin of the "transilvania" university of braşov. series vii, social sciences and law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2066-771X
pISSN - 2066-7701
DOI - 10.31926/but.ssl.2021.14.63.2.31
Subject(s) - tribunal , arbitration , focus (optics) , block (permutation group theory) , international arbitration , computer science , operations research , political science , law and economics , law , sociology , engineering , mathematics , physics , geometry , optics
The assessment of the efficiency of any arbitration procedure is made, more and more, in terms of time and costs. Therefore, the taking of evidence is one of the procedures whose effectiveness is under focus. This paper examines the recent revision of IBA Rules on the taking of evidence in international arbitration (the IBA Rules) as well as the Prague Rules on the Efficient Conduct of Proceedings in International Arbitration (the Prague Rules), a collection of rules issued in 2018, both aiming to assign a more pro- active role to the arbitral tribunal.